Honestly, I have no idea what case you are resting if you think a petition to SCOTUS to hear arguments to settle all of this means its already settled.
Its seems like there is literally nothing you will accept to show that this isn't settled yet.
Its seems like there is literally nothing you will accept to show that this isn't settled yet.
To the extent I’m challenging anything above, you’ll see it’s in rejecting anyone claiming this is obvious or settled.
Edit: 2nd circuit denied Kalshi's request for an injunction against NY's enforcement. So yeah... I think I'm within pretty good grounds to reasonably disagree with the 3rd circuit.