Hi! thanks for the feedback, I agree the voice model can use some improvements.
Regarding "shows that this hasn't been proof-watched, as you get two branches, each with "x1" on it but then you sum them not multiply (i.e the weights are not explained at all there)." I did proof watch them a few times, the weights on that first example are deliberately set to 1 to simplify the explanation since my goal with this series is about the high level intuition and not about the exact math behind it (which I assume a good chunk of viewers have either already seen elsewhere or can easily find with a quick search, so that part didn't feel as valuable/differentiated).
> the topic is super useful.
I agree! and I do appreciate this feedback so I can keep making (or well, prompting and polishing into existance) better content each time.