I hear this all the time, but the software I use is becoming obviously buggier and less pleasant.
It seems most people are bad at evaluating the quality of their work, especially if they purchased it from Anthropic.
It seems most people are bad at evaluating the quality of their work, especially if they purchased it from Anthropic.
It could have also been a "use AI to test our product more", but I don't see that anywhere.
I hope you agree LLM's can actually help with quality, if used for that purpose?
And it's not just restricted to software. Everything I care about is getting worse.
Dribbling about how it could theoretically be better doesn't help undo the damage. "Imagine how much fun we could have playing baseball", says the man with the baseball bat, as he kneecaps you.
I do think/hope that as LLMs improve, that improved quality would come by default, or that people would still compete in quality instead of quantity, but this is also the consumer's job to not accept shit quality products.
I don't understand what other people are doing differently to get worse results. We cannot ever go back to humans writing this code, because our competitors will eat our lunch if we do.