> Anthropic is way more focused. That helps in a way that builds upon another: their product tends to be better and the people's perception of it as well.
But they are still not likely to be investment-grade at IPO.
But they are still not likely to be investment-grade at IPO.
Does it mean something or is it a new buzzword. I am seeing this everywhere and the traditional meaning applied to bonds doesn't apply here.
Blackstone think that post-IPO Anthropic will start out with a junk credit rating.
FT seemingly covered it too if you can see it (I can’t):
https://www.ft.com/content/59383c7f-8d82-493f-bf01-d2e862a10...
Without them they have best coding/other(e.g. most accountants prefer claude) model on the market, with solid increasing revenue channels and loyal customer base.