>someone with knowledge
The problem with AI is that "someone" may not exist.
The problem with AI is that "someone" may not exist.
I think the bigger risk is what happens when they retire if we are not training the next generation of professionals.
This is exactly what we were saying with programming during early day of LLM. But that does not stop people from doing 100% vibe-coded projects.
Omarchy is one example, just ask the "developer" how stuff works in detail, without using AI, can they answer ?
You can try asking.
The only way for them to prove themself to the mass is a live coding interview session, without AI of course
That's ridiculous... Let's vibe code everything, but with a doctrine and principles!
If I'm going to do vibe coding, I don't need principles. No rules! And no future.
Yes I know. I was there too. ;)
> But that does not stop people from doing 100% vibe-coded projects.
And why should it? Let people "code" however they want to "code". Just like some people will find creative ways to play the guitar while others will just play covers.
By the way, you haven't addressed the core point posed: if people like AI output then is it still "slop" (in response to comments where people describe all AI output as "slop")
To me AI generated content is exactly like that. Cheap, fast and easy access.
It's fine for occasional consumption, and in some setting it's definitely not suitable to be served