Hacker News Reader

Comment by ianm218 | Hacker News Reader

If you put this into pangram it is 100% AI generated. People on reddit/ youtube are engagement farming anti ai content... with ai text and scripts etc.

The actual content is somewhat relatable but don't fall for the bait.

View on HN

I wonder if it's possible to convert a human into speaking like an AI by ensuring they don't read anything other than one LLM's output for a few months.

I’ve been thinking about this a lot… How long until humans start speaking like LLMs

Where do you think the AI learned it from? Go talk to any corporate drone.

That's not enough, you need to RL the human.

Honest question, some time ago people were claiming chatgpt zero or other ai detectors were not good, now everybody uses pangram. Is it that reliable?

From my vibes Pangram is very good. This [1] seemingly independent analysis is pretty positive on them and says there is no easy way to just beat it.

Presumably at some point there will be AI trained specifically to beat it but I think it’s fair if something sets off your internal AI detector (like me on this post) and pangram says it’s 100% AI, it’s probably AI.

[1] https://www.layer3labs.io/guides/is-pangram-accurate

Wow, good catch. I was fooled by this, and I'm usually not.

"The part that actually hurts is who is left." - that was the tell for me

Yea, funny how those stick out...

...how is this "anti AI content"? This is a real issue.

It's anti-ai because people didn't understand code in many (most?) companies already before agents wrote code. Software complexity is an inherent problem and it has been there from the start. Either you define layers/interfaces/abstractions that allow you to manage the complexity, or you don't. Yes, it gets worse if you don't, but blaming the tool for that is an excuse.

> because people didn't understand code in many (most?) companies already before

Okay let's not be revisionist. That's just not true, not even close to true for a vast majority.

If it was true we wouldn't have a term for it.

If the top level comment is to be believed, it's 100% written by AI. Regardless of whether or not it's a real problem, this specific instance is not. Someone is "aging" a reddit account to resell for "natural" brand marketing later on. Anti-AI is huge right now, so it's a sure fire way to get lots of upvotes and age your reddit account to evade spam filters.

No it's not.

Lots of apps can be 100% AI generated, even factory assembled. Especially if they're stateless.

We're leaning in with 100% AI software factory and no human review. We're making lots of revenue too.

The era of human always in the loop software is over.

You also see very new accounts on both HN and Reddit with similar claims. I'm sure there are elements of truth to some, but so much of it feels like comeuppance fantasies where the mean old execs mandating AI finally learn they were wrong.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com