Hacker News Reader

First off, it's Swartz, not 'Schartz' or 'Schwartz'.

As for the rest of your uninformed writings I think that 'intellectually dishonest' nicely covers it.

Please at least correct the name.

Rayiner's writings are some of the most informed writings on this topic that I've seen this week. They are all far more informed and intellectually honest than anything you've written.

Both you and Jacques would be happier if you avoided talking to each other for awhile. You have radically different perspectives and different investment in this particular tragedy and it's making your interactions go sideways.

It's good to have both of you on HN, so it seems pointless to cultivate a feud. A month from now, you both might find you enjoy having the other one around to engage with. Me and Jacques agree on approximately zero issues and I'm glad he's back.

Apropos nothing else, I agree that 'rayiner has been invaluable. The more people we have on HN that have taken crim law the better.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com