I think it is too bad that in the days of Google and the web there is no easy way to keep track of all new references to an uncommon term like that.
OK scratch the Perl example. Still standing by my point: it's a "problem" shared by many languages and it's not a problem in the first place.
"Basic" is around #9,500.
"Rust" is ~#10,950
"Java" doesn't appear at all (List goes out to 40,000) (Admittedly, somewhat biased by the dated-ness of the material, but it's still not a common one.)
Go is #106, and modern lists based on contemporary sources place it in the top 50 most used English words.
(1MB) word count list: http://norvig.com/google-books-common-words.txt
Go: 187, Basic: 759, Java: 7136, Rust: 13110
With relative frequencies 320M:103M:8.9M:3.6M ~ 100:30:3:1
http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=java%2Cperl%2Cm...
I'll assume you've never knitted.