There is a keen difference between questioning not even who someone's employer is but merely if that employer is a particular firm that they are defending, and demanding that someone who wishes to remain anonymous reveal their identity.

The fact that Florian likes to brag about his dubious credentials while PJ lets her analysis stand on its own merit really adds to it. Florian believes his identity to be vital to the worth of what he says, PJ thinks the opposite of herself.

Go read some of Florian's rants about PJ, and tell me with a straight face that you don't find it creepy and are surprised that she would choose to keep identity out of it.

This can be explained away with Cognitive bias, which is something we see a lot in these sorts of discussions. I find both protagonist in this case to be economic with facts.

I'm well aware that I'm as guilty of it as anyone.