With forethought, you should have built your system originally with method C in mind. If he had done this at the beginning instead of just hacking it together then all this work after wouldn't have been needed!
With forethought, you should have built your system originally with method C in mind. If he had done this at the beginning instead of just hacking it together then all this work after wouldn't have been needed!
1) Apply conscious planning and forethought. Some things are clearly going to be used a lot, some things might not. Use bolt-on hacks where appropriate, invest time for things you expect to be using forever.
2) When the longevity of the tool is not easy to pin down, test it out with a hack. Spend 1 day adding Stripe the hacky way, and keep a slushbucket of time budgeted for revisiting experimental hacks that look like they will last a while.
That's my general approach, anyway. Most of the time, a hack is good enough and anything more is a waste of time. The story is admittedly a little different for me though; for me, software is a tool to do my job- software is not my job.
We have only had to do 2 refactors in that time on 2 controls. That was more about understanding our customers needs more as we progressed rather than not enough planning though.
Previous to that I built a custom ecommerce site for a wholesale distributor. That whole process was more suited to a quick hack over a well thought out decision. That's why I say I agree in principle, so long as the project allows it.
That's how I develop now to be fair and not how I would build a product if I were to build it for myself.