www.earbox.com
My favorite piece of his is Harmonielehre, but there is lots of great stuff there.
One was the disengagement of general audiences from "classical" (for lack of a better term) music. The other was the disengagement of composers from general audiences.
Each group did this, largely for its own reasons, but each side's disengagement only sped up the other's. The result of this is that you have a general audience who is largely ignorant of what was going on in music, and a world of composers who became more and more insular, writing largely for each other and to make increasingly-arcane points about music theory.
This means that when you listen to contemporary classical music, you're A) listening to something that was not written with you in mind as an audience, and B) utterly lacking the background -- the traditions, the movements, the reactions and counter-reactions -- to understand what's going on in the music.
In a broader sense, this happened in basically all the arts, but music is one of the areas where we seem to notice it more often.
Define quality.
If you mean "you get much more to stomp your feet in the beat to", then OK.
I mean, I'm a fair amateur bassoon and piano player. I've played bassoon on four Beethoven symphonies over the years, and technically they were easily within my grasp. His piano sonatas push me, but back when I was actively playing piano I could make them sound like music.
I've played some more modern music which was much harder, and while I quite like some of it, I sure don't think it was "better" than Beethoven.
I think the exact same thing has happened to jazz, too, it's just a few decades behind "classical" music in the transition...