Teenagers are not kids.
Any law or measure that lumps teenagers and kids together is a sabotage.
Limiting kids' discovery of porn is a worthy feat, but trying to limit teenagers is poinless and stupid.
Any law or measure that lumps teenagers and kids together is a sabotage.
Limiting kids' discovery of porn is a worthy feat, but trying to limit teenagers is poinless and stupid.
"Suddently porn" is an annoying issue on many sites in the web that are on the side of shabby. Take torrent trackers for example.
My assumption is that it wouldn't be of interest to them and they'd move on, but that's pure speculation.
By sex live I mean the whole mental picture. If you start drawing it from accidental porn, you'll get it distorted.
You will get it distorted anyway when you'll seek porn, but now it would be your own decision at least.
By making it require a work around to view even mild pornography, the work arounds will inevitably lead to areas of the most hardcore right in your face.
Say some 12 year old wants to look at naked ladies, what's he gonna be doing? Probably google image search boobs or some soft core pinup girls name, relatively harmless and have his curiosity satisfied. However if the lower levels of that are blocked the work around with inevitably lead to a much bigger source with the violent pornography just a click away from the more regular.
Same thing happened with P2P, we used to have services where it was easy to download a single mid quality song, companies put an end to those so we found a much more efficient way to shift much larger amounts of data. Now it's hard to steal a single song but really easy to steal a full 320 album rip.