For example, the glial cells are now believed to be vital to the brain's processing, but most "brain simulations" are still modeling neurons only, not glia.
Worse, I don't think you're prepared to prove that a mostly pure-neuron simulation is incapable of giving rise to that certain complex quality apparently far removed from the level of the simulation.
No, questions can be answered by anyone, if they provide a relevant answer.
What the person making the claim thought is irrelavent. The parent gave you a valid reply.
So, basically, you're the only one being an 'asshole' here.