So it's a pedantic argument over the usage of the word intelligence. Sort of like your original quip, no?

Locke suggests the use of the word skill instead; however the definition of intelligence is the ability to apply knowledge and skills.

Given that the NICHD is pushing for consensus, and that I am not (and neither are you, given your non-primary source) qualified to determine the status of EI, let's not dismiss it outright.

How about contributing meaningfully to the discussion instead of alternating between trolling and non-authorative copypasta?