Another way to put it is, learning the postulates for langx doesn't provide enough value for many to be worth doing.
Another way to put it is, learning the postulates for langx doesn't provide enough value for many to be worth doing.
And I agree, this is one of the assertions my opponent has made. I did not go to refute it because, if not outright false, it's disingenuous.
>Another way to put it is, learning the postulates for langx doesn't provide enough value for many to be worth doing.
This is also true, same goes for everything else. I make money using C - I learn C's postulates. If somebody paid me to use topology - I'd learned topology postulates. What would be stupid if I were paid to use topology but said: "it's hard to learn and it makes no sense for me because I don't like mathematics and don't know any other math discipline so why would I all of sudden learn topology's postulate when I can copy formulas from the net and ask questions on manifoldoverflow.com?"