> I guess you're being sarcastic, but it's not that I fear progress will stop.

I'm not being sarcastic. Any technology that tries to correlate genetic markers with behavioral characteristics will be regulated out of existence. I'm not taking a position one way or the other as to whether this is a good idea, but I'd bet money on it being the outcome.

> Doesn't at all make it right, good, or mean I won't bitch about it.

Sure. But what it does mean is that it's an intended consequence, rather than an unintended consequence as your characterization suggested.