This, by the way, is no means or excuse for some of the shenanigans drug manufacturers take part in. It merely is one illustration of why a patent system should exist.
This, by the way, is no means or excuse for some of the shenanigans drug manufacturers take part in. It merely is one illustration of why a patent system should exist.
If we look at industries with less regulation, like software, the necessity for a patent system is a lot less clear.
Software is a terrible example, since every story such as this one demonstrates how absurd and stupid software patents are. It is plain as day.
The big elephant in the room problem with patents on medicine, is that government trade the life of some poor people for the incentive that some people might be more willing to invest in medicine research with patents rather than without it. We don't even ask if there is an alternative ways for the government to intervene, and use an 200 year old approach which creates value by excluding people who can't afford to pay to get access to medicine.
When people builds nuclear reactors, we ask what the potential good vs the potential harm there is. If we don't people die, which is why there is regulations. With patents, we have chosen the path of causing deaths, and we don't even ask if the price tag is worth it.
Patents are much more 'powerful' than needed for pharma industry. They hinder good research by universities and other NGOs.
And of course: what proportion of drug development is to replace high earning drugs for which the patent protection is expiring. (ie "solved problems").
I am not convinced that the drug industry needs patent protection. I have a gnawing suspicion that we have reached a point where it might be a better idea to just remove patents and see where the chips fall.