I have no desire to shoot someone. I don't fantasize about power trip, fatalistic shooting sprees. I'm not afraid of being out in society. I don't pose in the mirror with my guns. I don't buy all the latest accessories I see in Call of Duty. I score way below average on all those psychopathy tests floating around the Internet.
So what's the catch? Nothing. I'm the same as the next dude.
1. Disclosure: I may end up using the grenade launcher some day. They have some great aftermarket grenade cages that happen to be compatible with tennis balls.
Easy access to gun ownership prima facie facilitates shooting sprees by allowing the outliers easier access to guns.
Pointing this out is not necessarily an argument for gun ownership restrictions. I'm replying more specifically to the idea that your experience has any bearing on the relation between gun ownership laws and shooting sprees.
I'm curious - why?
I don't generally carry around stuff that I don't think I'll need, particularly if those things have to go on my person (e.g. in my pockets) rather than in a bag that I can put down when I'm stationary.
Are they all on power trips?
However, I agree that's a LOT of people. Even if only half are holding at any given time, it's 1% of the population... Scary.
If you heard a gunshot behind you, and you were carrying concealed, how would you react?
The tragedy isn't a shooting spree. The tragedy is a phone game causing someone's accidental death.
I mean, I'd have thought that Lite Brites were innocuous (only 4 weeks until that anniversary), so I can only imagine what one of the terrified might think of a real life assassin game....
Would you do it if you looked like me? I'm of Indian origin, and there's no fucking way I'd do that, not in the US.
But to imply that it wouldn't be even worse for someone who looks like they might be Middle-Eastern would be pretty disingenuous. I hope that's not what you mean.