Again, this isn't like a "bad for picky art professionals" type of bad. Just awful, I wouldn't even sell it to anyone I knew personally because I knew it would come back to bite me.
You keep repeating this as if it is some magic mantra. You have not defined any what "better" really means in manner that can be quantified and compared without introducing subjective opinions of a user.
Also, care to link to these "better" monitors, including sellers that sell these for the $500 price, as well as non-subjective reviews?
"Better" monitors are easily found through a simple search, and how do you exactly determine a review to be "non-subjective"?
http://www.displaylag.com/display-database/ http://thewirecutter.com/leaderboard/tvs/ http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/a-great-27-inch-lcd-monitor...
Fix the issues, turn this thing into a monitor, and corner the market for big monitors.
I'll wait for the Think Vision Pro 2840m for $799 in April though.
http://www.amazon.com/Nixeus-27-Inch-Resolution-2560x1440-NX...
Adjustable (height and rotation) stand, pack in dual-link DVI cable, all 4 major inputs.
I am definitely an amateur when it comes to display calibration, but I'm pickier than your average bear and these have acceptable picture quality when dialed in