Hacker News Reader

Comment by sanjeevrad | Hacker News Reader

You would only link with the net library (and its dependent libraries - like base and crypto)

And what about source and binary compatibility. What are the current guaranties? (his second question)

Edit: to be clear after you get your app up and running with the current version how much time has to be spent on ongoing maintenance down the road?

You build the libraries and link them into your libraries. If you maintain a cadence of updating your Chrome checkout every month, you will mostly be OK (though this can vary, of course).

So every month if I update I will be required to fix my application to work with the new versions of the library. Perhaps say 25% of my time will be _only_ on maintenance? And from what I recall things are not deprecated for a while, but very rapidly changed with little to no warning. This was a major headache.

Why not just stick with a stable version for a while? Updating every month sounds like a huge headache.

Because the Chrome team makes huge, breaking changes to their code APIs with breathtaking rapidity. If you don't update that often, it'll just get harder and harder and harder to do.

Google can do this (in general) because they have a single source tree (although IIRC Chromium isn't actually part of that). Point is: when you only care about your own code, as the Chrome devs do, third parties are in a really bad place to try and stay current.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com