For the record, I downvoted it because I don't think that sort of sarcastic comment (posted on its own, adding nothing useful to the conversation) doesn't belong on HN, not because I missed the sarcasm.
The long version is: "This would make for a suitable precursor to a renewed attempt on cracking down on some of the liberties in the internet. I personally don't believe in gov't institutions being nice and I find it most sad that this being a farce is the first thing that comes to my mind.
Unfortunately, where I come from, child porn is the #1 official reason for any attempt of internet censorship."