It's not different. The audience in this case is people who are fluent in Python. Saying that code sample is bad is like saying Baudelaire is bad because only people fluent in French can read it.

This starts to get into "what is idiomatic python?" which changes as the language evolves. For example, before Python had an official ternary form, this was a common idiom:

    account.status = ["paid", "unpaid"][amount_due > 0]

This does the same thing as the FizzBuzz example, coercing a bool to int. Here the int is used as an index into the list of the two strings.

Personally, I found this handy and liked it a lot. Others didn't and now there is this, which isn't bad:

   account.status = "unpaid" if amount_due > 0 else "paid"

Maybe it's less like using obscure French and more like speaking in a slightly different dialect, or in a different region with different cultural references.

Multiplying a string by an integer is fine.

Treating a boolean as an integer is iffy

Multiplying a string by a boolean frankly should be a no-no.