Ya, good call. It is a super interesting fallacy that people interested in disassembling dysfunctional status quo models should be good at calling-out. Something like a "post hoc rationalization".

For me, another use case is 'all the fantastic things that have been invented because of war'.

Perhaps a form of the fallacy of composition?

P(X) = "X exists due to the government"

S = "Scientific developments"

Fallacious statement:

∃x ∈ S (P(x)) ⇒ ∀x ∈ S (P(x))

Stating that this reasoning is always a falacy is in itself "coulda woulda shoulda" "falacy".

Strict reasoning is hard.

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of this).