What is the benefit of not allowing links in a post? Is it a purposeful decision or or is it just that no one has bothered to implement it.
When allowed, some then stop submitting primary links, and instead wrap even more commentary around the (now in-text) link than is possible in an editorialized headline. This also effectively reserves for the submitter a permanent "top comment".
> Don't abuse the text field in the submission form to add commentary to links. The text field is for starting discussions. If you're submitting a link, put it in the url field. If you want to add initial commentary on the link, write a blog post about it and submit that instead.
You aren't supposed to use the text field for submissions that are really links. I assume links in the text field aren't clickable to discourage this behavior.