One request: don't introduce the concept of 'nibble' on the first page. It's jargon that no one needs in this general introduction. And it just sounds silly.
One request: don't introduce the concept of 'nibble' on the first page. It's jargon that no one needs in this general introduction. And it just sounds silly.
And it sounds silly and adds nothing. That too.
(edit: my education on this stuff was in the 00's. Sounds like it was more common in the 80s. I'd definitely support obsoleting the term entirely now, though! It adds unnecessary complexity.)
And replace it with what? Bistable multivibrator?
That was last year, I also got the impression that he liked to fill likely gaps that he could do with small detours.
I don't think I read or heard about it again for over a decade. It's never sounded silly to me, or at least no more silly than "byte", and it's at least slightly useful to explain converting hex.
Its not a synonym for byte. In modern systems, a word is typically 4 or 8 bytes.