The motivation behind this project is that a professor I am working with had snow melting on his roof. He looked into thermal cameras but found them prohibitively expensive at $4k-$40k. So, we decided to build a cheap camera that only used a single thermal sensor and take the picture as fast as possible.
This camera relies on the fact that many real world images are of the same color (e.g., the sky is mostly blue). It looks for the areas that contain the most detail, the edges, through something called the wavelet transform.
Thanks for the reference to the wavelet transform--it is nice to consider a concrete context where this operation can be employed.
not to mention the wave of extremely cheap thermal imagers we got this year -Flir one, seek thermal, all in ~$200 price range.
However, there's no doubt a small mobile platform is very usable. The primary goal behind this work was not to make a product: it was to provide a proof of concept. We were interested in the image processing and showing that some heavy lifting could be done on a small mobile platform (the Raspberry Pi).
You are correct about the acquisition rate. However, the acquisition rate was more limited by the motors to move the sensor into place.
Btw their $4000 E8 thermal camera has VERY SAME components inside (from 320x240 bolometer down to firmware) as $950 E4, only difference is digitally signed config file (that used to be hackable)
Your platform might of been limited by motor speed, but once you reach 10-20 reads per second you will hit a brick wall of thermopile inertia and that will be the end.
Our website is a bit thin but we have experience with imaging at XGA and 1080p. The spatial-temporal dimensions of the data with this sensor are quite different from pin-hole FPA imagers. You can trade off spatial resolution and temporal resolution with more freedom than readout ICs. You can also skip the image and go straight to information measurements for pattern/event matching.