Why do you believe this? The argument that 2^1024 is a very large number, but that the number of possible movies is larger than this strikes me as fairly compelling.

To see this, we look at a former invention of Sloot. ... Sloot patented a device that had all the schematics of every TV already on it in a heavily compressed form.

This would seem to involve compressing PDF of the schematics, and then encrypting each with a password that is specific to the disk and the schematic. Positing the existence of a secure database that keeps track of which password works for each document on each user's disk, and assuming that the total size of the compressed documents doesn't exceed the capacity of the disk, this seems plausible. But I don't why this would have us believe in the infinite movie device.

Secondly, why would patent status of this earlier device encourage us to believe in a second purported invention that most (all?) experts in the field believe to be impossible? Are the patent examiners greater authorities than the experts? Even if the second invention itself was patented, this would influence me less than the fact that he secured multiple investors who parted with real money --- which I think is an interesting point in Sloot's favor, but one that can explained by human psychology and greed.

Since you have a new account, my first presumption was that you were trolling, which I'd define as pretending to believe an untenable position to see if you can get a rise out of others. But degree of detail and excitement in this and your couple earlier comments makes me doubt this, and think instead that you believe what you say. Without trying to be too offensive, who are you, and why did you write this comment?