Until they can be sure they can reliably control it during descent, they are choosing their landing sites so that even in the very worst case, it can't come down on top of someone. This pretty much means it has to come down in the Atlantic.
2. You launch over the ocean (or other sparsely populated areas) for safety purposes. All rockets so far have dropped stages or engines on the way.
3. To get to orbit, you have to do mostly horizontal acceleration (8 km/s or so). That's why the rocket points eastwards soon after launching, and staging happens already far from the launch site and why the first stage has a lot of horizontal velocity towards east. You don't want to fly a dog-leg as that wastes energy.
If you are like me and wondering what makes Vandenberg AFB (California) so good then, well it turns out it's great for polar orbits specifically. Draw a line south from Vandenberg AFB and you don't hit land until Antarctica.
> 1. You launch eastwards so you get the bonus speed from earth's rotation
Once the ship leaves the ground the earth's rotation has little to do with the flight except for landing location.
source: I play KSP
Alternatively, just switch to "orbital speed" on your navball while sitting on the launchpad. That's what you benefit from if you are launching west-to-east, but what you have to overcome if you launch into a retrograde orbit.
A spacecraft that would launch from the ground and start westwards, would, after gaining the first 400 m/s relative to its starting point only be stationary relative to the earth's center. Then after 800 m/s, it would travel at 400 m/s westwards. Say if your orbital velocity is 8.0 km/s. Your total delta vee would be 8.4 km/s.
In comparison, an eastward flying rocket would start from 0.4 km/s , and would need rocket propulsion only for the remaining 7.6 km/s. A 10% saving compared to the westward rocket!
In reality it's a bit more complex as you don't launch straight east or west anyway, and ISS is at a 50 degree inclination etc...
> Kourou lies at latitude 5°3', just over 500 km north of the equator. Its nearness to the equator makes it ideally placed for launches into geostationary transfer orbit as few changes have to be made to a satellite’s trajectory.
> Launchers also profit from the ‘slingshot’ effect, that is the energy created by the speed of the Earth’s rotation around the axis of the Poles. This increases the speed of a launcher by 460 m per second. These important factors save fuel and money, and prolong the active life of satellites.
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Launchers/Europe_s_Spacepo...
Launch trajectory is always over water for US launches, so if the rocket fails there are fewer people to hit below.
The launch sites they use were built for non-recoverable launch vehicles which are dropped to the sea. The launch sites have a narrow range eastwards, and SpaceX needs to adhere to the restrictions despite being able to land the boosters safely. This means that their rockets will inevitably be going over the sea.