[1] my comment when this "source" was posted to HN (before it was flagged for removal): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8789341
Yes, I know that Chuck Johnson (http://gawker.com/what-is-chuck-johnson-and-why-the-web-s-wo...) is unreliable and worse. But in this case, I thought the data sound enough to republish.
After reading that article.. why would he believe anything from this guy?
The point I meant to get at was that the timecode analysis which was featured is not just claimed by Charles Johnson, but rather is in the torrents released by GOP.
I don't have any problem with Schneier referencing this article.
Deleted comment
Deleted comment
I agree with your criticism of naming former executives. But Schneier also expresses his skepticism towards this viewpoint, and merely states that the data transfer speeds do seem to support the "inside job" argument.
He continues to say that he still doesn't buy the "inside job" theory.
For transparency's sake, my post was (from memory):
> The data is publically available on torrents.
>
>You could easily prove Schneier wrong.