Hacker News Reader

Comment by rasz_pl | Hacker News Reader

Michael Dell, Bill Gates

Gates knew his family was rich enough that he could go back and finish his degree if the business didn't pan out. If you've got that financial cushion and you've got something better to do with your time then sure, drop out. But dropping the GPA "just because" is probably not your best option.

There's a big difference between being a college drop-out and being a high school drop-out.

The latter realized the futility of it sooner than the former.

Eh, a compsci degree would have helped me in some cases. I ended up studying algorithms and such by myself anyways. OTOH, I've interviewed people with degrees in cs and they couldn't even explain binary search, let alone implement it.

I dropped out cause my teachers were atrocious. My algebra teacher couldn't explain why absolute value was a function, just that it was and we must learn it, period. Another teacher said "computers just use binary". When I pointed out I often saw hex, instead of pointing out why base 16 is a good fit for writing binary numbers, she just stammered that computers were just binary. Still my fault for giving up, but I had enough reason at the time.

Wow, sounds like the typical heres-the-teaching-plan-dont-ask-me-why, NCBLA, spoon-fed idiocracy. Back in highschool, thankfully we had one honest guy that just let us do whatever the fuck we wanted (which was pretty awesome).

All of the borderline-useless hazing you might have missed at a "top 50" school (one of the UC's):

    - Java to MIPS asm compiler in both Java and C++
    - Reimplement the major parts of OpenGL pipeline in C++
    - Hack on MINIX 2.x kernel, reimplement some *NIX tools
    - Gates up superscalar, pipelined, branch-predicting, microcoded integer CPU in VHDL and its own microcode language
    - Caching HTTP/1.0 proxy server
    - Interface various hardware to PICs, FPGAs and PALs
    - Problem sets upon problem sets, ad infinitum
    - Coed dorms where the doors are always open, but you won't have time for more than just hooking up
    - Sleepless all-nighters (2-5 per week) and all the junk food your meal plan can afford (because you won't have time to cook)

Worse. My parents had a rather religious phase and sent me to a religious school. Science teacher literally said "carbon-14 dating is a lie from scientists that hate god". If I'd have read The Selfish Gene, or even A Brief History of Time as a kid, it'd have saved me a lot of time.

Those things you list seem relatively good, no? Making a microprocessor from gates while " just hooking up " sounds pretty near idyllic.

Could you expand about absolute value? Is seems reasonable to me to think of it as a function.

Well it was introduced as "absolute value uses lines on each side. It means you drop the negative if there is one". I asked what the point of it was, cause it sounded sorta useless. Instead of saying "OK, well, how would you express distance, x1-x2?", she was just stuck.

I suppose that's what happens when you have general teachers that don't really know maths or science, don't really feel that it's interesting and offers amazing ways to look at the world. In fact, I'd be surprised if she actually knew beyond what she was teaching. It's not like middle grade teachers have to take advanced courses, and they do have a wide workload.

Maybe pedagogy recapitulates history of mathematics. "What is a function?" is kind of a wrong question, because "function" is just a word (what is it you need a "function" for?), but in a lot of early mathematics the idea tended to describe a sort of physical intuition, that a function was something like the shape that something physical (like a string under tension) - remember that in the early days mathematics was more a branch of physics than a discipline in its own right. In nature things tend to change smoothly - what we now call "analytic functions" - and you wouldn't ever have a sharp inflection point like there is for absolute value at zero.

A more modern notion of a function only really came about after the discovery of the fourier transform, where it turns out that functions like absolute value (and sillier things like the dirac delta) have a fourier transform, and, worse, some perfectly ordinary functions like sin have fourier transforms that come out as these weird things. Eventually (and, I suspect, partially because the tools of fourier analysis were so useful) people started treating "something that can be fourier transformed" almost as the definition of a function.

(The present set-theoretic definition of a function is even more recent; I would assume it comes from Russell/Hilbert/etc.'s efforts to give mathematics a formal foundation by expressing everything in terms of set theory)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com