That's not to say that you wouldn't gain SOMETHING, nor that it's a bad interview question. I actually like it. It's just not terribly productive, in an engineering sense.
That's not to say that you wouldn't gain SOMETHING, nor that it's a bad interview question. I actually like it. It's just not terribly productive, in an engineering sense.
Indeed、you can even go to the electron level to describe what's happening in the circuitry and how it interacts with the silicon to propagate signals... it's never ending.
This article could just as well have included an explanation of how and why electrons travel from one point to another, or "the quantum effects that govern this" (a figurative example).
A metaphor for this that references the world of electronics is the ability to always increase the resolution of a display. We can keep going on, although the human eye might not be able to pick up a difference after a certain point.
Perhaps there is also a limit to the usefulness of increasing the level of detail in an explanation, as this article does, just as there's a limit to the usefulness of increasing display resolution.