Is that true? I thought the rule was first to file, not first to invent. And I have never heard of a blog post counting as "prior art".
The fact that a two sentence blog post about using a simple 3 way switch to control a microphone is in fact prior art strong enough to bust a potential patent is just a sad, sad commentary on the quality of patents being issued today.
First to file/invent isn't actually relevant for prior art though. Any publicly available source that describes the invention can serve as prior art. However, patent lawyers are very good at "writing around" existing patents and other prior art.