Publishers, too, have a case to answer. Was La Vanguardia entirely in the right to republish its entire archive, or was it careless?
It's interesting that is the only piece of discussion in that whole multipage article about how the information ended up in public in the first place.
I guess it's a better story to blame faceless machines and algorithms than for a newspaper to blame another lazy, thoughtless newspaper publisher?
I think there are issues around how Google deals with exposure of personal information (think deliberate trolling campaigns). But this is a weak story that provides no insight into what future issues of privacy will look like.