I don't know much Rust. But your comment just made me appreciate Rust a lot more!
To me, this signals that they value long-term safety over short-term convenience. Any other choice, IMO and IME, is short-sighted.
To me, this signals that they value long-term safety over short-term convenience. Any other choice, IMO and IME, is short-sighted.
Most of the times i think is a overburden, I know people like Haskellers like to suffer and are masochistic coders, and may like this, but i dont.. already have to deal with C++, and Rust did achieve the impossible.. Its even more over-enginnered than C++, and its not even faster
Then, later, we suffer much less through runtime debugging, QA, and get a lot less calls at 2AM.
Can you explain more about what you mean by 'over-engineered' here?
> and its not even faster
We are faster sometimes, and we haven't even put time into optimizing things. We're also slower sometimes.