Part of living in a free society is learning some tolerance: tolerance for other viewpoints; for other races; for other religions; for other cuisines; for other modes of dress; and yes, for other lifestyles.
Part of living in a free society is learning some tolerance: tolerance for other viewpoints; for other races; for other religions; for other cuisines; for other modes of dress; and yes, for other lifestyles.
You are free to vacate the space; the smoke will not give you cancer anyway and 'disgusting' is pure prejudice.
> I see no reason why we should accommodate that as a society.
Because in a free society we tolerate different lifestyle choices.
Unreasonable smokers are exactly why laws are needed.
You're wrong about the smoke too. Look at the number of children who need medical treatment because their parents smoke around them.
Of course I do. I'm quite willing to do as a property owner or lessor requires. Note that smoking-banners are the intolerant ones, bringing in the force of law to compel behaviour they desire.
> Unreasonable smokers are exactly why laws are needed.
Likewise, unreasonable non-smokers are exactly why laws are needed.
It's not about "tolerance", it's about not forcing others to inhale the same carcinogens as you because they do not want to get lung cancer. "Your freedom ends where my nose begins."