Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia run by the non-profit Wikimedia foundation, Facebook is an ad-serving, for-profit social network.
So I would argue that Wikipedia is the perfect candidate for such a program, and Facebook the worst.
So I would argue that Wikipedia is the perfect candidate for such a program, and Facebook the worst.
Except for the high likelihood of having a pop over of Jimmy Wales asking for money show up on all your content.
Net neutrality is a means to an end, not the end itself. And wiki being available to millions or billions of people for free doesn't threaten the "open internet."