Says something about Ars' business model, that a hoary old site seems to sustain itself with some throwback non-native ads and subscriptions, while the Huffington Posts of tech journalism have to sustain growth beyond their audience and crisp initial point of view, into something mushy and barely palatable.
I would like to be very wrong.
[0]: http://arstechnica.com/cars/2014/07/a-day-in-the-new-porsche...
[1]: http://arstechnica.com/cars/2014/07/hands-on-with-audis-flag...
They might not be the flashiest, highest-profile tech news site, but maybe that is part of their advantage--less clickbait and more actual reporting.
Their coverage of modern password cracking was also top-notch and, with the "correct horse battery staple" XKCD, changed the way a lot of people think about strong passwords.
Alas, that was something of a perfect storm for The Verge, and these days most of their content that isn't aggregation seems to consist of fairly vapid, Gawker-esque "thinkpieces" and "hot takes" designed only to drive readers to the comment section.
http://www.polygon.com/2015/4/6/8285529/looking-glass-histor...
http://www.polygon.com/features/2015/5/21/8627231/the-first-...
The day-to-day Polygon "news" doesn't interest me much, but their "features" have been excellent.
I understand they need more traffic but if I want film reviews I'll go to a film website I don't understand why they think their game reviews are equipped to discuss things they don't know much about.
Yeah.