His myopic openly hostile anti-conservative POV in defense of /r/politics. I provided one fact that by no means was intended to be comprehensive, and have since updated it to a far superior one. Rather than discussing the topic, he focused on my character (e.g., "lack of reading comprehension").
Ha. Geez. It had nothing to do with reading comprehension, and the fact that you both jump to assumptions that I must be something like stupid despite my evident articulation proves my point further regarding your propensity to mischaracterize opposing views. /r/politics' liberal bias is near-universally known amongst conservatives on Reddit. Because of this, I unsubscribed, and so never bothered to read that it was US-only. So it was a faulty assumption on my part that had no relation to reading comprehensive or my stated point in any way.