> It had nothing to do with reading comprehension, and the fact that you both jump to assumptions that I must be something like stupid despite my evident articulation proves my point further regarding your propensity to mischaracterize opposing views. /r/politics' liberal bias is near-universally known amongst conservatives on Reddit.
> So it was a faulty assumption on my part that had no relation to reading comprehensive
You are correct. It is not reading comprehension but rather the fact you make ignorant accusations with no basis in fact and then rewrite your posts to make you look less ignorant.
The problem you have is a combination of ignorance and arrogance that you rely on to justify the assumptions and bias you have.
You still ignored the underlying point that you are looking for evidence to convince you that your bias is true while selectively omitting facts.
> Easy. Tone down the hostility and thanks for proving my point. Despite my ignorance WRT non-US posts, a quick glance at the top /r/politics stories from the past month[1] displays the bias I mention: there is literally not a single pro-conservative post, only libertarian, liberal and anti-conservative posts. It's not my intent to prove anything however, so lack of facts to support doesn't disprove my opinion either. I posted to have a discussion, not whatever you're trying to have.
Libertarian is a conservative ideology as evidenced by the number of Republicans who espouse Ayn Rand's views and read her books then regurgitate that in interviews. It is fiscally conservative by design which is why it is a common Republican reference point.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/12/news/la-pn-vp-paul-r...
Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, etc.
So I'm assuming you are basing it on stuff like this:
> http://atlassociety.org/commentary/commentary-blog/3448-myth...
However, if that is the case you are stating you are a social conservative.
Fair enough, social conservatism [e.g. anti-abortion, anti-LBGT] is not well liked on Reddit. I can agree with that.
> It's not my intent to prove anything however, so lack of facts to support doesn't disprove my opinion either.
"A lack of facts to support my opinion" is evidence you don't have an opinion based on reality and you can see where that rabbit hole goes.