> but then decided against it because the math is a bit too abstract and unapplicable
Combinatorics isn't really abstract as far as math goes. In fact some call it concrete mathematics.
Combinatorics isn't really abstract as far as math goes. In fact some call it concrete mathematics.
Not that I really have anything against abstract mathematics. It's still very cool, but it's just not going to get me very excited - or at least this exact branch of it, I guess.
Huh? Is it naturally abstract?