Yes, I'd love to know these are all exceptions to the rule-- it would make me feel much better about the politics I'd like to believe, but the other camp is going to have to provide the data to back up their alternative hypothesis.
Yes, I'd love to know these are all exceptions to the rule-- it would make me feel much better about the politics I'd like to believe, but the other camp is going to have to provide the data to back up their alternative hypothesis.
What the null hypothesis is or isn't does not change in your case, nor does multiple anecdotes equal data.
While making irrational decisions with regard to one's economic situation and laying blame elsewhere is hypocritical, it is not behavior exclusive to poor people, and neither is "investing" in gambling. There is also the fact that poor people are not proven to consistently make these sorts of irrational choices.
Any camp making any sort of claim is going to have to provide data.
All the while, we have merrily ignored any other potential contributing factors, which will change depending on how we define poverty (absolute/relative, local/global, etc.) [0], including (off the top of my head):
- History (e.g. colonialism, exploitation);
- Government policy (discrimination, segregation, ethnic policies, etc.) [1, 2];
- Social attitudes/culture (stigma, prejudice, etc.) [3]
- Nation status (underdeveloped nations ravaged by war, for instance);
- Social mobility (auto-bootstrap-pulling, singular data points aside) [4];
- Risk factors in early development (lack of nutrition, stimuli and resources) [5, 6];
- Dumb luck (born into wealth, stumbling over winning lottery ticket).
[0]: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/theme...
[1]: http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/01/11/discrimination-inequality...
[2]: http://www.nytimes.com/2000/04/05/world/un-says-bad-governme...
[3]: http://www.socialwatch.org/node/16324
[4]: http://web.stanford.edu/group/scspi/issue_social_mobility.ht...
[5]: http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/what-poverty-does-to-...