Hacker News Reader

> it's an overly broad definition if you classify political action as speech.

The Constitutional protections in the first amendment of free speech, press, assembly, and petition are all largely motivated by the desire to protect political action, because restrictions on any of those things inhibit political action.

Its an overly restrictive definition of speech that excludes political action.

View on HN

There are multiple definitions of the word speech and I'm drawing a distinction between expression and action.

I think there's enough of a difference between mob-mentality and artistic expression that we can deal with them separately.

Yeah, but the sense of free speech that was important to the founders and has become ingrained in American culture and which motivated the protection in the Bill of Rights was not primarily about "artistic expression", it was about the means to rally political action -- to motivate the mob, so to speak.

You can talk about different kinds of speech separately, but if you are talking about the entrenched American value of free speech, you ought not to separate from "speech" the kind of speech -- that directed at motivating political action -- that that value is first and foremost concerned with.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com