Citation needed. An article (and on the Register at that) is not any indication that "they're doing nothing"...
> We reported this vulnerability to Apple on Oct. 15, 2014, and communicated with them again in November, 2014 and early 2015. They informed us that given the nature of the problem, they need 6 months to fix it.
However, doing nothing seems to be unfair:
> We checked the most recent OS X 10.10.3 and beta version 10.10.4 and found that they attempted to address the iCloud issue using a 9-digit random number as accountName. However, the accountName attribute for other services, e.g. Gmail, are still the user’s email address. Most importantly, such protection, based upon a secret attribute name, does not work when the attacker reads the attribute names of an existing item and then deletes it to create a clone under its control, a new problem we discovered after the first keychain vulnerability report and are helping Apple fix it.
So not nothing, but their iCloud 'fix' doesn't work and there's no fix for the real issues. But the researchers say they're helping Apple fix it, so nothing does seem unfair.
Post some screenshots of the app with screenshots of some random Paypal transfers and I don't think that you will have a problem getting people to find/download your app.
A standard Trojan game/utility would work fine even if only a small number of people run it.
No, this isn't a remote root, but it's pretty severe and not something that should be downplayed with italics.
The section of the paper on mitigation suggests that it is non-trivial to correct without significantly re-architecting the app-OS relationship, if the paper is accurate, Apple is in a very difficult situation.
It seems that stating just a fact from the article is not liked by some
So as good as nothing, but not nothing.
I mean, I understand that there are still a lot of Apple fans here at HN, but Apple's security has been a laughing stock of the industry for a while now.
I've yet to see any massive platform that is both flexible and open to millions of users that has zero security flaws or exploits developed for them. Not saying it's a good thing, but it's certainly a common thing, even among companies that give several shits about security.