It invokes imagery that doesn't anywhere near equate reality. I advise you to avoid puff pieces, find the truth in actual journals and save your compassion for things on a case-by-case basis.
For those who aren't aware, there is another side to the story. There are many people who inflate these statistics for their own benefit.
I could elaborate.
It's still coalescing around these politically charged "all or nothing" terms; begging the question. As if I don't grab a pitch fork and swallow any of the "human rights" pablum, I'm a heretic.
I have a bias learned from being in America and being forced to jam puff pieces down my throat without ever cross-examining it on the merits. Every liberal term is hoarded up for some self-serving reason that has little to do with people's betterment.
Please do.
is an example.
I am not as pessimistic as anon3_ but it seems good practice to examine the claims of companies and organization no matter if they are bad (Big Tobacco) or good (charities).
First of all, it is weaselly. It is saying that "there is a counterargument" without actually making it.
Then, it sort of vaguely draws the conclusion that because there are instances of lying related to human trafficking in the world, the whole concept of human trafficking is a lie. That's like taking the case of a false rape claim and encouraging everyone to understand that women lie about rape.
It's trying to sneak away imagery of pain and powerlessness, for selfish interests. How dare these people intrude on the lives of others and act as if they know what's better, stealing hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
You want to know how to make money? Go into business spitting liberal epithets and get funded by UN, governments and NPO's. These guys are frauds that need to be exposed. They distract us from the real victims.