Another interesting tidbit: You'll find this on both sides of most public discussions I guess.

A whole lot of the people who tries to defend man made global warming in public forums seems to be parroting what they have heard, just like the naysayers.

Getting to the facts instead of gettings served up brochures seems hard and asking questions gets you smacked down by a bunch of zealots.

Which is why I found this piece interesting: at least some numbers and charts that seems understandable.

Lots of people across broad spectrums do this all the time. It's uncomfortable to publicly admit you don't know something; a lot of people, especially otherwise smart people, try to apply their expertise in one area to another area they have no specialized knowledge in.

Programmers as a group are maybe a little bit worse about this than most other groups (except maybe physicists), because they view themselves as "systems people", and "everything is a system", therefore similar rules apply everywhere: software is buggy by nature, so scientific research must suffer from similar error rates, for example.

Well, a lot of people argue that the moon landing was a hoax (without knowing basic engineering) and that the holocaust didn't happen (without knowing basic history). I find it more depressing than baffling.