From the article:
> There was also strong incentive for us to promptly pay him, so he’d keep playing.
I loved that line, because it's the converse of a casino player in a hole, thinking maybe they can make it back if they keep on playing.
> There was also strong incentive for us to promptly pay him, so he’d keep playing.
I loved that line, because it's the converse of a casino player in a hole, thinking maybe they can make it back if they keep on playing.
It's more than an inverse in thinking, it's how the house makes money.
But, as you pointed out, they can't ban him, because they have no way of recognizing him when he walks back in.