Hacker News Reader

This argument is getting too deep. It's not a good use of time to argue about the philosophical validity of the nature of advice.

View on HN

It's not a great use of time to argue with strangers about nothings on a message board, but people do what they do.

This argument started because you accused me of writing a nonsensical comment. The accusation was negative, highly offensive and not inline with policies of hacker news. Now it's descended, thanks entirely to you, into argument about bullshit.

So to prevent people from wasting their time; Maybe you should be less offensive. That's my advice to you. You can take that advice or you can go to hell. That's all I have to say about this topic. I refuse to continue it any further.

Your original outburst began with negativity and calling names. I pointed that out, and it turned into a conversation of whether comments that have consensus are good advice. And certainly, even comments that have consensus can violate the HN guidelines.

People are free to choose how to use their own time.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com