Hacker News Reader

Comment by SG- | Hacker News Reader

I specifically mention that even when it tries to do hardware acceleration it isn't as efficient. I know it does h264 hardware acceleration along with 3D stuff. It does it, it just does it really poorly compared to native alternatives.

The blackbox comment is referring to it not being part of the DOM.

View on HN

Efficiency is a really subjective benchmark. Especially when there are multiple browsers and platforms in play. Look at the WebGL example posted a few comments above - it will very efficiently warm up your GPU :)

Of course the content of a plugin is not a part of the DOM - however you're not calling MP4 videos or webfonts "blackboxes" for not being able to read their source code from the web inspector either...

> Efficiency is a really subjective benchmark

Playing SD quality video in HTML5 in Safari; minimal CPU usage, 7 hours battery life (on a 2012 MBA). Playing SD quality video in Flash in Safari; heavy CPU usage, audible fan noise, 2 hour battery life.

In a past life I did some Flash development; the Windows player was generally a little better (with the Mac one being in between and the Linux one being _horrendously_ inefficient), but it was still far from _good_.

it isn't, it's pretty easy to measure CPU usage along with energy usage with the exact same video file across multiple browsers on the same computer and across different players (html5 vs flash).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com