http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1505.pdf
Page 6 has the list and the weights of all goods per category. Housing is 42% of the CPI index, for example. Urban consumers vs Rural consumers are combined together, but the later tables split them out again.
People generally only talk about the single CPI number as an indicator in inflation. But a lot of work (and tables) go into that number.
The CPI is flawed, of course, like any attempt to turn 300 million peoples' worth of purchases into a single number. The Federal Reserve itself thinks that it's a little bit on the high side, not doing enough to adjust for the changes that occur when better products are introduced or when people change their purchasing behavior (e.g. switching to generic products): http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic...
> a lot of work (and tables) go into that number.
Economics is a whole field of study.
The CPI doesn't even in theory try to do that, which is why it includes CPI-U, CPI-W, and C-CPI-U, each of which is tracked raw and seasonally adjusted, and each of which contains numerous measures (not a single number), the most frequently used of which seem to be the "all items", "all items less food and energy", "food", "energy", and "gasoline" components. (And all of which relate to US urban consumers -- for CPI-U and C-CPI-U -- or a subset thereof -- for CPI-W -- which are less than 300 million people.)
The CPI, in America at least, is literally thousands of items. Probably stuff like bus pass, bread, milk, a hammer a Daisy Red Ryder BBGun, etc.
Obviously a the bbgun was a joke, but I wouldn't be surprised if bullets or ammo made the cut.
When you change the items in the basket, you make the index basically incomparable with previously used measures. That is what makes it such a juicy target for politicians. And you have to change it at some point or another, because new products get invented. For instance, if your basket does not now contain a month of cellular phone service, it needs to be updated.
For example The last UK government didn't like the new CPIH index and the ONS (office of national statistics) was told to go away and try again.
This means the basket might differ from country to country, because consumption patterns are different.