In Minnesota, there is an obligation to aid individuals who have been harmed and MN officers are trained to do this. Indeed, reports exist of MN officers responding to gun shot wounds (GSWs).
Referenced posts:
7 karma · joined July 7, 2016
In Minnesota, there is an obligation to aid individuals who have been harmed and MN officers are trained to do this. Indeed, reports exist of MN officers responding to gun shot wounds (GSWs).
Referenced posts:
What I will suggest is that overall violence does not seem to be correlated with the rate of police killings - see the third image in ref. 1.
[1] http://mappingpoliceviolence.org/2015
EDIT:
I can't reply to you due to the HN rate limit. Please see my response below:
I appreciate your response but I take issue with the data source behind that post (ref 1). I don't intend to take it apart fully, but it appeared to included factors (e.g., average commute time) that:
1. Systematically disfavor urban areas
2. Have little bearing to the question at hand, whether violence is correlated with police killings
Additionally, my claim above (2) is that violence and police killings, across the municipalities with the highest rates of police killings, are not correlated (ref. 3).
[1] http://places.findthehome.com/#guide
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12048043
[3] http://static1.squarespace.com/static/54ecf211e4b0ed744420c5...
See my earlier posts:
I only want to respond to the following claims:
> he is not a trained EMT with access to a trauma kit that would stop 4 GSWs [gunshot wound, clarification added]
There are other cases where Minnesota police officers are documented to have responded to gunshot wounds (ref. 2) Indeed, certain MN police departments provide additional training, beyond basic first aid, for trauma situations - see the edit to ref. 1.
Further, you're implying that highly-specialized training ('EMT'), specific medical supplies ('trauma kit'), and injury severity ('4 GSWs') are important in considering rendering aid. My contention would be that, those factors absent, having a gun drawn and yelling at a victim are not appropriate responses to an event of this type.
> he is also alone and has to secure the scene until backup arrives
Backup is clearly present by the time the video is rolling and multiple officers appear on the video when Mr. Castile's girlfriend is removed from the car.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=12047969
[2] http://www.startribune.com/documents-detail-accidental-eden-...
More broadly, EMTs are not the only individuals capable of providing support after a shooting. Indeed, some state governments (e.g., VT and MN) have a statutory "duty to rescue" those exposed to grave physical harm for all individuals.
One would hope that police officers would be the most likely to do this, especially after a grievous injury - even if the wounds proved not to be survivable, this is hard to assess from feet away, with a gun drawn.
As an aside to counter a point you make elsewhere, there are multiple other police on the scene in the video, though it's not clear at what point they arrive.
1. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/man-shot-dead-minn-...
EDIT:
For posterity's sake, here's a press-release description of medical training that many Minneapolis/St. Paul are police officers receive:
https://hcmcnews.org/2013/01/09/hcmc-network-feature-real-li...